With windows control more than 24 + 2 vu-meter via serial, when they control "only" 48 + 24 + 2 without any problem, and I could duplicate or triple the number.
If handled well, the serial connection to Win, is a lot more versatile with Dos, or other OS (OS type Mackie), comparable to LNX.
I moreover, I optimize many processes in ASM to maximize the speed (all processes that have rewritten it for the DXB, I made them right in ASM, comp / eq / GEQ ...).
What do you mean audio protocol?
You mean the firmware or something?
Because there is no audio communication between the CPU and the audio mixer.
As for the fact that "the surface can not be reached without the firmware" I solved the problem.
In fact the control of faders, encoders, LEDs etc. etc., can be reached simply by sending the right commands.
Then just turn on, send 4 commands, and you can reach everything.
I asked to subscribe to the group, because I hope (if there are numbers) to obtain the original source code, with which to develop a new firmware "bespoke and user demand."
I have already done this with several other audio devices, much more complex, and much more complicated. Hardware limits not scare me, just optimize the extreme, and is room for much more interesting and useful (and, in the case of D8B, necessary).
I do not need to control the market: Probox you sell at a price that does not know, but I can definitely say that with an Arduino $ 20 you get the same result.
So do not talk to me of open source.
If you want, I design an object similar to Probox, with Arduino, and open souce, both hardware and software.
I with the DXB (to quote always something Mackie), I created a software that goes beyond (very well) the initial project, and those who wanted the software has only contributed to my expenses for electricity, and I just recovered less than 16% of the costs, and everyone can confirm my commitment and my reliability.
I spent two years and a half of work, and continuous development.